Monday, March 3, 2008

White Rats

At the Etchells Midwinters in Miami, PRO Dave Brennan decided to try something new, and in the process may have changed sailboat racing as we know it.

The Etchells class has been around since the early 70’s, and at age 35+, it is arguably the hottest one-design keelboat in the world. Many of the biggest names in the sport sail them now along with a strong and committed group of class stalwarts who’ve been sailing them for years. The Jaguar Cup, an annual series consisting of four events sailed in Miami and capped off by the Midwinter Championship, now draws 90 boats from all over the world. And this isn’t just any 90 boats – it’s a deep 90 – and while the racing is off-the-charts good, the unfortunate by-product is that even after a 2.2 mile first beat, everyone gets to the windward mark at the same time. I mean EVERYONE.

The Etchells is a very pretty boat, and it’s a joy to sail. There are very few designs that are quite as pointy, however, or as unresponsive when the helm is hard over, which makes these “en masse” mark roundings particularly scary. So the Biscayne Bay race management team decided to try something new: two windward marks. And why not? Given the fact that the leeward gate has become de rigeur at pretty much every event that I’ve sailed in over the past 10 years, I’m surprised it’s taken this long for someone to take a shot at the windward gate. Paul Elvstrom incorporated it into his innovative “triple racing” format, but to my knowledge, it hasn’t been tried in a high-profile fleet race yet.

So despite some whingeing from the peanut gallery, Dave told us his plan on Thursday evening at the competitors’ briefing: We would have two marks approximately 10 boat lengths apart that would be rounded from the inside out – with no offset marks (which would turn out to be the fly in the proverbial ointment). Our team did quite a bit of thinking about the tactics and rules situations that rounding the right-hand mark to starboard might create – things like:

· The spinnaker would be hooked up on the wrong side – we would need to figure out how to add a windward set to our repertoire.

· Bearing away on port into the teeth of a lineup of starboard tackers on the layline to the right-hand mark while trying to do a windward set would be challenging to say the least.

· Should our choice of windward marks be dictated by traffic, by which mark is further downwind or by which side of the run we wanted to play?

· In a port rounding, the boat coming in on the layline and tacking has few rights – in a starboard rounding, the boat coming in on the layline and tacking is in total control.

So our assessment was that the addition of a second mark would significantly open thing up and create new opportunities to gain (and lose) ground, but we would need to rethink our spinnaker packing and setting routine. Given the likelihood that there would be a line of starboard tack boats that would make it difficult to bear away to a run or roll right into a jibe set, we would need to run the spinnaker forward and set it off the bow. For this, we went back to the old “Soling roll” technique of rolling the chute into a bundle, and we set it up with the sheets and halyard led between the mast and the shrouds so that it could be easily run forward by the forward hand like a running back with a football while the middleman (me) shifted forward to the halyard for the hoist.

But what about the “fly in the ointment” that I mentioned earlier? Along with leeward gates, offset marks have also become the norm, and with good reason. When a starboard tack boat bears away around the windward mark into a line of port tack boats sailing upwind, very bad things can happen - and the offset mark does a reasonably good job of preventing these bad things. But with a windward gate, would you still need offset marks? Would setting two windward marks AND two offset marks be too much for a single mark boat crew to handle? The BBYC race management team determined that the windward gate would obviate the need for offset marks – and this was the one and only mistake they made. When a boat that’s going downwind on starboard jibe and heeling to windward passes to leeward of a boat that’s going upwind on port tack, masts can come very close together, and on the very first rounding, aside from a number of incredibly close calls, Bruce Burton got his mast taken down.

For the second race, out came the offset marks, and after that, it was relatively smooth sailing. A windward gate doesn’t thin the herd as much as a single weather mark does, and one of the interesting side effects is that everyone gets to the leeward gate at the same time. There were some hair-raising pileups there, but most people are used to leeward gates by now, and good judgement seemed to carry the day.

Overall, I think the experiment was a success. Two windward marks are probably better than one as it keeps the fleet closer and creates more opportunities to pass boats – good if you’re behind. The downside is that you apparently still need offset marks which will strain the resources (and the backs) of many race management teams. Not so bad in Biscayne Bay dropping marks in 20 feet of water – a daunting prospect in places where the water’s pretty deep. There are those who’ve argued that a 90-boat fleet may not have been the best place to try this out, but I’d like to see other clubs follow Dave Brennan’s example and give it a shot.

Who knows? Ten years from now, we may not be able to remember what it was like to sail in races with only one windward mark.

4 comments:

Unknown said...

Kattack was demoing their software to 20 boats at the Etchells Midwinters on Friday. Download the free player from their website (www.kattack.com) and view the races with the Windward Gate.

Peter Huston said...

Bill, you are correct that it was Elvstrom who first proposed the idea of gates.

I was part of the Balboa YC race cmte for the '89 Snipe PCC's where we first tried the leeward gates. A couple of us had worked the 30+ boat Schock 35 Nationals the prior year, and the leeward marks were a nightmare. We asked the Snipe fleet if we could try this, and they said yes without hesitation. Worked really well. But like Dave Brennan, we got a ton of grief from others, but eventually it worked our OK.

I also wanted to try weather gates a year or so later - but everyone said it was a dumb idea. Flash forward to '06, and I brought it up again in 'butt - and again, most laughed at me.

Glad to the Etchells class take the ball and run with it. Sounds like it worked out very well.

Below is the article that I did for 'butt on this subject - maybe it will help some of the remaining naysayers better understand the benefit.

Peter Huston

Archived Newsletters
SCUTTLEBUTT 2184 - September 20, 2006
Scuttlebutt is a digest of major sailing news, commentary, opinions,
features and dock talk . . . with a North American focus. Scuttlebutt is
distributed each weekday, with America’s Cup coverage brought to you by
UBS (http://www.ubs.com/sailing).

STARBOARD STACK-UP SOLUTIONS
We’ve all been there at one time or another - even with the best of
planning, trapped on the port tack layline at the weather mark, with no
way to find a legal way into a long line of starboard tack boats getting
ready to round the weather mark to port. The rule changes of the last 10
years or so seem to have made for less protests in this sort of
situation, but it hasn’t led to any increase in passing lanes, or
general enjoyment, unless of course your idea of a good race is a
parade.

Leeward gates have been in fashion for almost two decades now. While no
one is exactly certain where the idea of a gate came from first, wise
veterans of the sport tell me it was probably something Elvstrom first
suggested. When leeward gates first started to become popular and well
promoted on the west coast, I asked Dave Ullman if he had ever used a
weather gate. He said that he in fact had, at several large (meaning
probably 100+ boats on the same line and course) 470 regattas in Europe.

One of the benefits we’ve seen from the America’s Cup is their change to
starboard roundings in match racing. I suspect that the Swedish Match
series also helped to foster the growth of this trend in match racing.
Now it comes that in the recently completely Kiel German Sailing Grand
Prix, for the fleet races between the three AC boats, weather gates were
used, with I’m told by a participant in the regatta, a great deal of
success. The problem with really short courses with large fleets - which
could mean even 15 boats - is that the overwhelming premium half way up
the leg is protecting the right, so you have a chance to get in line at
the weather mark. Depending on the course and breeze, often times your
starting strategy is geared towards getting in line at the weather mark.

While it is a lot more simple to just set one weather mark and round to
starboard, it might be better if we started using weather gates for
windward-leeward races. This will of course place a premium on the
ability of the RC to have a first class mark set team - but if all the
racers take one day off a summer and help set marks for their fleet, the
problem of additional RC personnel is largely solved.

Starboard stackups aren’t any fun for anyone. Why not try starboard
roundings or weather gates in fleet races? The worst thing that can
happen is that it doesn’t work and we go back to what we know. Or maybe
it works well and we all have more fun. -- Peter Huston,
http://tinyurl.com/j6w6c

Moose said...

I think the point to be made about the weather gates is that everyone actually embraced the idea, if there were offsets. The RC pretty much dismissed this conversation at the skippers meeting, shooting down Vince Brun among others, as it being unneccesary since you would essentially have two 45 boat fleets going around opposite marks. When it was pointed out that if you had 45 boats going around a single mark you would have an offset, they blinked and did nothing about it, refusing to even write up a potential amendment on the topic. It took two races of crashes, collisons, unfiled protests and near misses before they acceded to the requests of the competitors and drew up the amendment on a board on the back of the RC boat (I'm not even sure you can do that, rules wise, but who cares). With the offsets in place, everything went very smoothly and the fleet was very happy with how things went. It just baffles me that the RC wouldn't even consider what the fleet knew was going to be a huge issue, and it was.

Anonymous said...

If you think that you might be well furnished for dealing with words on potential loans, leading to high credit cost [url=http://www.odogh.co.uk/]long term loans[/url] long term loans According to the company, the interest rate runs from 15% up to 50% a week http://www.fhyxc.co.uk/